The Federal Government on Monday blamed the 36 state governors for the lingering nationwide strike by judiciary workers.
The strike by the workers, under the
aegis of the Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria, has paralysed courts at
all levels since it started on January 5.
A statement by the Director
(Information), Federal Ministry of Justice, Charles Nwodo, said the
Federal Government had in no way contributed to the strike which entered
its second week on Monday.
JUSUN had embarked on the ongoing
nationwide strike following the failure of the Accountant General of the
Federation, Mr. Jonah Otunla, to honour an agreement stipulating that
the implementation of the financial autonomy status of state judiciary
would begin in December 2014.
The Memorandum of Understanding was
signed by stakeholders, including the Accountant General of the
Federation and some JUSUN officials on November 27, 2014.
The MoU directed a prompt compliance
with the judgment delivered by a Federal High Court in Abuja on January
13, 2014, ordering the Accountant General of the Federation to deduct
funds standing to the credit of judiciary in the Federation Account and
disburse them to the various heads of court.
Nwodo said, in his statement on Monday,
that the Federal Government was not in breach of the judgment which was
delivered by Justice Adeniyi Ademola of the Federal High Court in Abuja.
He added that workers of federal courts
were only on a solidarity strike with their state counterparts due to
the failure of state governments to comply with the judgment.
The statement read in part, “That the
Federal Government is not in breach or violation of the aforementioned
judgment of the Federal High Court. This much has been publicly
acknowledged by JUSUN in all their statements and deliberations;
“That the strike is actually directed at
state governments that are yet to comply with the judgment; that
federal courts are thus only on a sympathy strike with their state
counterparts.
“The foregoing notwithstanding, the
Supervising Minister of Labour and Productivity (Kabir Turaki), has been
working assiduously with relevant stakeholders to resolve all the
challenges that may have militated against the implementation of the
judgment of the court.
“The Federal Government acknowledges the
imperative of an efficient and effective judiciary to our democratic
consolidation and is doing all that is within its constitutional powers
to ensure full implementation of the judgment.
“We therefore call on all well-meaning
Nigerians to appreciate the dynamics of the federal structure that
Nigeria operates and the constitutional limits of the Federal Government
when dealing with states, especially with respect to matters within
their constitutional mandates.”
He added that the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation was worried about the strike.
Nwodo reiterated that the judgment by
the court had ordered the funding of the judiciary to be in compliance
with the provisions of sections 81(3), 121 (3) and 162 (9) of the
Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999.
The statement read further, “The Office
of the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice notes
with concern the ongoing strike embarked upon by the Judiciary Staff
Union of Nigeria to press for the implementation of the judgment of the
Federal High Court, Abuja, delivered on January 13, 2014 (Coram, A.F.A.
Ademola ) in suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/667/13.
“The Federal Government reiterated that
the judgment delivered by Justice Adeniyi Ademola in the suit with
number, FHC/ABJ/CS/667/13, ordered that the amount standing to the
credit of the states’ judiciary in the Federation/Consolidated Revenue
Fund be paid directly to the Heads of Courts in the various states’
judiciary in compliance with the provisions of sections 81(3), 121 (3)
and 162 (9) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,
1999.
“This strike is unfortunate and has
paralysed the activities of the judiciary throughout the federation. The
Honourable Attorney- General of the Federation is however constrained
to issue this statement in view of the misconceptions and insinuations
in the print and electronic media concerning the strike and the efforts
being made to address the implementation challenges posed by the
judgment.”
No comments:
Post a Comment